When then-Treasury Secretary Jack Lew decided in 2016 to put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill, he knew it would be up to the next administration to implement the change. But it seemed highly unlikely that anyone would upend a plan to honor this great American hero with a currency redesign that would also include depictions of historic events such as the suffragist march on Washington. “I don’t think somebody’s going to probably want to do that — to take the image of Harriet Tubman off of our money? To take the image of the suffragists off?” Lew said incredulously.

No one can blame him for a failure to imagine that any future administration would be so petty and narrow-minded as to go out of its way to thumb its nose at women, minorities and history. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin disclosed to Congress Wednesday that redesign of the $20 bill to include an image of the former slave and leader of the Underground Railroad, slated for next year to mark the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage in the United States, has been pushed back to 2028. Tubman was selected following a massive grass-roots campaign to include a woman on U.S. paper currency.

The explanation Mnuchin offered for the delay — the need for more time for “counterfeiting issues” — would be laughable if it were not so insulting. Are we really expected to believe that the administration, one that boasts about its can-do capabilities, needs eight more years to implement a new design? If indeed counterfeiting matters are the primary reason for currency design, shouldn’t you start first with the $20 bill, since it is one of the most widely circulated?

It is more likely that Mnuchin, as the New York Times reported, feared President Donald Trump would cause an uproar with an outright cancellation of a bill bearing Tubman’s image. As a candidate, Trump criticized the decision as “political correctness,” and he has made no secret of his admiration for former president Andrew Jackson, whose image Tubman would have dislodged from the front of the $20 bill.

Some would argue there are bigger issues facing the country than who is on the $20 bill, and no doubt the administration is guilty of far more serious offenses. But symbols matter. Backpedaling on putting the first African-American woman on paper money tells women and girls and people of color that they don’t — and never have — mattered. Trump has found yet another way to show that he does not really aspire to be president of all Americans.

—The Washington Post

(1) comment

Schreff

Now, here is a prime example of Swamp Post Fake News. First, the Swamp Post is assuming that the Secretary of the Treasury is lying. Second, so what. If this is the way to appease the political correct critters in this Country it is silly bordering on ridiculous. Shouldn't the Swamp Post be cheering the historically low black unemployment rate and the many other good things being done for our minority Americans? Fake News and their socialists bias have contributed greatly to the dividing of America.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.